courtesy of http://farewellsweetnicotine.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/pennywise-the-clown.jpg
When I visited the Nazi concentration camp of Auschwitz some thirteen years ago, a question kept ticking in my head while I marveled at the monstrous monuments of human evil: how was it possible for these gas chambers to stand in the middle of Europe in the middle of the 20th century? While it is still mind-boggling, one can understand it better when considering that the Holocaust did not happen overnight and it did not start with the building of the gas chambers. It didn't even start with the deportation of the Jews, or the passing of the anti-Jewish decrees. The ground had to be plowed since people don't easily depart from their moral convictions so they need to be mentally prepared to accept views that go against their morality.
5 years before Hitler wrote Mein Kampf (1925) and13 years before he became chancellor of Germany (1933), established the Third Reich and passed the first anti-Jewish decrees, a book was written by two prominent scholars of the time, Karl Binding and Alfred Hoche. Binding, a jurist, was a Rector of the University of Leipsizg, while Hoche was the director of the psychiatry department at the University of Freiburg im Breisgau. The title of their book was Die Freigabe der Vernichtung Lebensunwerten Lebens, (Allowing the Destruction of Life Unworthy of Life) (1920). The term 'lebensunwerten lebens' (life unworthy of life) became a pivotal concept of Nazi eugenics and referred to those who were 'deviant', who had a 'low quality of life' or were the 'source of social turmoil'. The 'deviant' category included, but was not restricted to, the mentally ill, the disabled, homosexuals, and intermarriage partners. The author of Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide, psychiatrist Robert Jay Lifton, describes the progression of the principle the following way:
"Of the five identifiable steps by which the Nazis carried out the principle of "life unworthy of life", coercive sterilization was the first. There followed the killing of “impaired” children in hospitals; and then the killing of “impaired” adults, mostly collected from mental hospitals, in centers especially equipped with carbon monoxide gas. This project was extended (in the same killing centers) to “impaired” inmates of concentration and extermination camps and, finally, to mass killings in the extermination camps themselves." (1)
When I read about bioethicists advocating involuntary euthanasia and lawyers writing up documents about redefining personhood, it freaks me out. It's not because I think that they are wicked Nazis who are weaving malicious plans about the recycling of gas chambers and the extermination of babies and disabled people while periodically letting out a villainous laugh. It's not the people and their intentions so much that I am worried about, but their ideas and views that they are spreading. Ideas and views can take on their own life and can get adopted by all sorts of characters. Karl Binding and Alfred Hoche were prominent scholars of their times who were probably not brewing plans to exterminate 6 million people. They merely constructed ideas, wrote them down and let them loose into the the consciousness of contemporary society. Similarly, the advocates of the American eugenics movement probably never dreamed about their ideas being adopted and used by a German nationalistic group as an excuse for systematic genocide. But that's just the intrinsic nature of ideas. Once you create them and let them loose to freely wander, anybody can catch them and adopt them. Once you come up with ideas such as 'certain human beings are nonpersons' or 'the sanctity of life doesn't apply to every human being' or 'certain lives are less worthy of living', you can't control who will use it for what purpose or agenda.
And this is why bioethicists advocating involuntary euthanasia and lawyers writing up documents about redefining personhood freak me out. Even more than creepy clowns.
1. The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide by Dr. Robert Jay Lifton (holocaust-history.org)

17 comments:
You are sooo right...and it is very frightening.
This is so important -- a real argument for ENOUGH and an argument for not staying silent.
I think what worries me is that the arguments seem quite reasonable to many people who DON'T KNOW anyone with a disability (and that means really know, not just bump into someone occassionally). How many times have I heard the "waste of resources" comments I wouldn't like to say. And this goes back to misconceptions of disability, myself included it's sad to say, I would have been frightened at the thought of caring for someone with a severe disability, although now I do it with happiness.
However, there are also families facing life and death desicions for a loved one every day, and I feel more than lucky to never have been in that position. What we need to stay away from for sure, is the kind of dehumanisation that comes along with these bio-ethical debates.
This is a creepy clown! And I was struck by this same thought when my husband and I watched "Expelled" by Ben Stein. Hitler only carried to the logical end this thinking. In a perverted way, one should admire Hitler for being totally consistent with his belief structure.
Erika, thanks for sharing this post. It is so insightful, and I agree...scary. I have a hard time wrapping my brain around people who can actually logically come to these kinds of conclusions. I've learned much from these posts.
On a side note...so happy Izzy is home. I hope you are all recovering from your most recent hospital stay. Love you guys!
Fantastically written post erika! My god, you are a phenomenal and scholarly writer. I love the way you put this and agree with you 100% I feel your fear. I loved this post. Keep writing -- those others put words out into the world but you can too. we all can. and every time your thoughts touch someones mind and heart, its a chain reaction.
well said, erika!
on a side note . . . did you ever see the movie Poltergeist? That clown is freaky. And that has freaked me out for years!
Thank you guys for the "backup" and for the encouragement. I always feel like a" mommyblogger gone bad" when I write these sorts of posts, but it weighs on me and I feel like nothing is more relevant concerning Izabella's future.
Very well said. Keep writing...
I love-love-love your insights. And I just realized that we are two Hungarians communicating in English, again. :)
Love you guys, and I am so glad you are home.
I didn't comment, because I didn't know what to comment without leaping into a 47 page response. But I'm glad you wrote it :)
It is unfortunate that once an idea is put into the public realm, it is available for all sorts of people to use and abuse.
Great post, once again.
Wow. This is fantastic writing---thought-provoking, powerful, intelligent. Just wow.
Thanks for stopping by my blog as well. Now to add you to my following list...
Erika,
I always love reading your posts. They are so educational. I agree with you 100%. It is scary how "innocently" these ideas may begin and how atrocious they could be if put into practice. Hugs,
You are just brilliant and I'm glad to see so many other people saying that too!
Agreeing with Corrie on the accurate connection represented in the documentary "Expelled". No admiration from me for Hitler, however, under any fact or perception of his life.
"They merely constructed ideas, wrote them down and let them loose into the the consciousness of contemporary society."
I think you credit them with too much innocence; not enough responsibility for the consequences of their words. Every link in the chain of the eventual evil bears responsibility.
Going back to the documentary, a strong link is atheism.
Nope. Don't see you as a "mommy blogger gone mad" but I do think this circle of bloggers think and read at a level not lived-in by most.
Barbara
Orsi - Thank you, dear, I love you too :) I don't even notice what language I'm speaking most of the time. I'm just happy if it's not Hunglish.
Kim - Thank you for commenting anyway :)
SD - Thanks :)
Nancy - Thank you. I love your blog. It's like a breath of fresh air. And you always manage to make me laugh. Or at least smile.
Amanda - Thank you. And I always love it when you come by and comment.
Ann - Thanks for all the encouragement and love. We love you guys.
Barbara - I gotta get this documentary, you made me so curious with your comments. Is it out on DVD? I see what you mean by saying that I credit the two authors with too much innocence, and it definitely can be read that way. However, what I meant to say, but didn't formulate explicitly enough, was that they didn't have to be the ones carrying out the genocide in order in order to be instrumental in it or at least partially responsible for it.
Thanks for not seeing me as a mommyblogger gone mad :) and also for the kind words.
Wow, great post erika. Powerful writing.Very well said!
I have felt similarly appalled by attitudes towards the lives of those thought to be limited by their physical situation or others definitions of difference. How can anyone judge the 'quality' or validity of someone else's life? The idea disturbs me greatly.
I am not a christian or 'pro-lifer', but I am uncomfortable with euthanasia, (for animals too). I feel the 'spirit' leaves the body when its ready to, cutting it short feels 'wrong' (from personal experience). And I don't see 'suffering' as something to be avoided or ended at all costs. I have felt it as just one of the intense flavours in the experience of life and ultimately an intrinsic part of it, whether-we-like-it-or-not.
I have not hear someone articulate this so well. Thank you for your sharing of research too. If I had a magazine I would ask you if I could publish it.
I come through the Bearded One's blog - this is my first time here (Sorry about all the " and ()s!)
Post a Comment